I have reported on a court case that has a bearing on whether I can use this blog to call psychologist Ken Perlmutter the Sandusky of the family court, and intellectually bogus. The law clearly favors my free speech right to tell the truth, but I would like to know that the courts uphold that right.
The case is in DC and involves global warming, not the family court. But the DC law is extremely similar to California. Unfortunately the plaintiff has won the first round of the libel lawsuit.
This is distressing, because I was counting on getting any libel lawsuit dismissed on the first round. I do believe that Ken Perlmutter, Faren Akins, Bret Johnson, Irwin Joseph, Heather Morse, and various other family court officials are intellectually bogus and worse than Jerry Sandusky. However, I do not want a libel lawsuit, so I may have to go easy on these creeps until the global warming lawsuit is resolved. Fortunately, that case is getting a new judge who is not as incompetent as the first judge, and I think that the new judge will dismiss the case.
So in the meantime, I am going to play it safe, and not imply that Ken Perlmutter is a child molester.
I see what you did there.
Post a Comment