Today, Dec. 21, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the California ban on change therapy from going into effect, because it granted an injunction pending the appeal in Pickup v. Brown, according to Liberty Counsel. The law was originally set take effect on Jan. 1, 2013, and was designed to ban any counseling of minors seeking to deal with same-sex sexual attractions, behavior, and/or identity.We can thank a conservative pro-family group:
The banning of any counseling of minors for this issue, would have kept children from receiving counseling at the request of parents that may steer their child away from a homosexual lifestyle. But, since the court granted the injunction pending the appeal, the practice of change therapy will still be allowed for now.
Liberty Counsel President Mathew Staver, whose Christian legal aide group is representing reparative therapy practitioners and recipients in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the law, applauded the court's decision to grant his request to delay its implementation.Staver is right. The corrupt psychology profession has acquiesced to LGBT pressure to prohibit telling the truth to kids who desperately need it.
"This law is politically motivated to interfere with counselors and clients. Liberty Counsel is thankful that the 9th Circuit blocked the law from going into effect," Staver said. "This law is an astounding overreach by the government into the realm of counseling and would have caused irreparable harm."
It is primarily the left that wants to censor other points of view. The gay shrinks claim that the banned therapy is ineffective and harmful, but there is no published evidence that it is any less effective or more harmful than any other form of therapy.
You may think that homosexualtiy is inborn, but scientists have found no proof of that, despite a huge amount of research looking for a gay gene. Whether it is or not, a parent might well think that a 15-year-old boy or girl has some unhealthy or perverted sexual inclinations, and seek professional help. Under this California law, a psychotherapist will lose her license if she says or does anything to "reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the same sex."
This law would not have passed if prominent psychiatrists or psychologists had objected. Their support for this law is proof that you cannot trust your child to one of these shrinks. She will encourage him to engage in homosexual behavior against your wishes, and cite confidentiality to refuse to tell you what she is doing.
5 comments:
US researchers find evidence that homosexuality linked to genetics
Such findings would further the debate over whether homosexuality is innate or a choice
60
Compared to straight men, gay men are more likely to be left-handed, to be the younger siblings of older brothers, and to have hair that whorls in a counterclockwise direction.
US researchers are finding common biological traits among gay men, feeding a growing consensus that sexual orientation is an inborn combination of genetic and environmental factors that largely decide a person's sexual attractions before they are born.
Such findings - including a highly anticipated study this winter - would further inform the debate over whether homosexuality is innate or a choice, an undercurrent of California's recent Proposition 8 campaign in which television commercials warned that "schools would begin teaching second-graders that boys could marry boys", suggesting homosexuality would then spread.
"Gay Gene" Survived Evolution As It Is Carried By Mothers Who Have More Children, Study
Male homosexuality is inborn and may be triggered by a gene carried by mothers, new findings suggest.
By Christine Hsu | Jun 13, 2012 02:52 PM EDT
GEORGE SAYS..
"You may think that homosexualtiy is inborn, but scientists have found no proof of that, despite a huge amount of research looking for a gay gene."
YOU MAY THINK WHAT GEORGE SAYS IS TRUE, UNTIL YOU LOOK INTO MATTERS.
Read more at http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10287/20120613/homosexuality-gene-mother-reproduction-evolution.htm#2HbRyri3YyMd4Phi.99
The first article says that "gay men are more likely to be left-handed", but left-handedness is not usually inborn. This is supposedly "feeding a growing consensus". It does indeed feed an LGBT lobby political opinion that homosexuality is inborn. But scientific evidence is lacking.
The second article is based on a study that concludes: "Conclusions. Our findings are based on a small sample and would benefit from a larger replication, however they suggest that if sexually antagonistic genetic factors that induce homosexuality in males exist, the factors might be maintained in the population by contributing to increased fecundity greater reproductive health, extraversion, and a generally relaxed attitude toward family and social values in females of the maternal line of homosexual men."
While the article keeps referring to a "gay gene", the studies have found no such thing.
US researchers are finding common biological traits among gay men,
Male homosexuality is inborn and may be triggered by a gene carried by mothers, new findings suggest.
IT SAYS WHAT IT SAYS,
" BIOLOGICAL"
"INBORN". BELIEVE WHAT YOU SEE, NOT WHAT YOU'RE TOLD TO SEE AND BELIEVE.
I quoted the conclusion of the actual published study. I post the scientific facts. The belief in a gay gene is almost entirely political, as no such gene has ever been found.
Post a Comment