His VP, Joe Biden, brags that his proudest political accomplishment has been the Violence Against Women Act.
Colleges get a lot of federal money, and are subject to a lot of federal regulations. What do you think happens if a college professor or student is accused of sexual misconduct. Would a man be considered innocent until proven guilty? The answer is no -- not under Obama administration regulations.
Joseph Cohn carefully explains the arguments for and against a presumption of innocence:
On October 1, I penned an article for The Chronicle of Higher Education arguing that the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights' (OCR's) insistence that colleges and universities use the "preponderance of the evidence" standard when adjudicating accusations of sexual misconduct was wrong. OCR says the standard must be used on campus because it is the standard used in federal courts for civil suits. But OCR's comparison of campus tribunals with federal courts is deeply flawed because it fails to take into account the many due process protections required in federal courts that ensure the basic fairness of trials—protections that aren't required or commonly provided on campus.So a boy may be accused of sexually harassing a girl, and then he will get kicked out of college because the college was more concerned with protecting itself from Title IX liability.
In response to my piece, Nancy Hogshead-Makar, the senior director of advocacy at the Women's Sports Foundation, and Brett A. Sokolow, the founder of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, have authored a Chronicle op-ed of their own.
Hogshead-Makar and Sokolow do not attempt to refute my point that the comparison of campus tribunals to federal courts is inexact. Instead, they broadly argue that OCR's mandate is appropriate for three reasons: (1) they claim an institution's use of any standard higher than preponderance of the evidence may be considered "deliberate indifference" by a federal court, thus potentially subjecting a university that employs a higher standard to liability for violating Title IX; (2) they claim that the preponderance of the evidence standard is the only fair standard on a normative basis; and (3) they claim that the preponderance of the evidence standard protects the best interests of the colleges, the students, and the employees. All three arguments are faulty.
The article has a link to a defender of the Obama policies, so you can read it yourself.
Keep in mind that if a boy is accused of a crime such as rape, the accuser can always make a police complaint and get a criminal prosecution. The accuser can also file a civil lawsuit. These college regulations apply when there is no criminal or civil complaint, but a girl tries to get a boy kicked out of college for non-criminal behavior.
The colleges ought to be treating their own employees and students as being innocent until proven guilty. And they ought to have due-process protections for anyone facing career-ending accusations. But thanks to the Obama administration, the colleges now have feminist-written policies that force an accused man to prove his innocence.
My name is karah from Philippine, i have little words to say about a spell caster that stop the divorce of me and my husband. myself and my husband has been married for 14years, and we have never had misunderstanding that would last for a week, but just last month here, my husband started acting weird and disrespectful, he do come home late and drink and smoke himself out with his naughty friends.
he no longer have time for me and our kids, he was really becoming frustrating staying with a man who nolonger care if his family has eaten or not.
And when i took a close look, i found out that he was seeing another lady outside our marriage. i acted as if i dont know, my husband was so stupid enough that he started bringing her home and when they come, they stay at the other side of the house.
I was wondering because i know my husband can never be that foolish to bring a woman to our home. I will cry day, night, and all time regretting ever getting married to such an sweetheart who later turn out to be an idiot.
One faithful morning i was just checking the internet when i saw so many good talks about this spell whose email is email@example.com, i decide to try and see if there can be resolution to my dum. I spoke to the spell caster over the phone and told him my troubles and he said he is going to check what the problem is first before caster spell.
And few hours later he called me and he told me that there is a woman who has blindfolded my husband and even now, my husband is planing for a divorce. And this i never knew. And when i went to see our lawyer he said its true that my husband is discussing about our divorce.
This made me cry more and angered me that i could not take it any more and when i comfronted my husband, my husband said he is tired of the married and he want out.
I felt like i was been drowned, and i asked the spell caster to save my marriage before its too late but the spell caster told me that firstly he will cast a spell to separate my husband and the other lady, and cast another spell that will reunite me and my husband together again as one. And he said this is going to take 5days before i see results and at exactly the actual time and date, i saw my husband crying at the bedroom running to me kneeling apologizing for how stupid he has been for hurting me and the kids and he promise never to offend me or the kids ever again.
everything looks as if its a movie and later on, my husband would call me at every seconds to ask were i was, even when he is in the office, he would want to know if am fine.
this spell caster on firstname.lastname@example.org really did a wonderful thing in my life and marriage. just dont think thank you is enough.
Any one who have similar issue should not just go waste time with other spell casters, instead this man is the perfect caster i have ever known.
Post a Comment