What California does, as many states, there is a grid. And they look at this grid and say -- How much does the mom make? How much does the dad make? How much does it cost to raise a child? They put those things together, and they split it up. If the mother makes a lot more money, she is going to have to pay more. If the father makes a lot more money, he is going to have to pay more.No, this is not right. The cost to raise a child is not a factor at all. And if the mom has full custody, then her income is not a factor either.
She also talked about how the parents can settle out of court, but that is not correct either. The parents do not have the ability to make a binding deal that the courts will uphold.
The term "child support" is misleading. The system is really a cross between an income tax and alimony. It is not what most people think at all, and not even what TV legal experts think that it is.
5 comments:
'And if the mom has full custody, then her income is not a factor either.'
REFERENCE IT. This blog is a wealth of misinformation!! Are you even living in or from CA???
DCSS collects I&E reports without bias from both parties, even if the mother has SOLE legal and physical custody. I know this for a fact.
One word, "Dissomaster."
they do take InE's from both parties, but the mother's income does not factor into the support calculation. THIS I KNOW FOR A FACT because that's what happened to me and was explained at great lengths by the kindly and wise Irwin Joseph in court when I lost full custody of my kids. It's simply then a percentage of bad dad's income. Period. Call or write your local child support services today, operators are standing by......
That's right, if the mom has sole custody of 2 kids, then the dad pays 40% of his income as support to the mom. It has nothing to do with the income of the mom or the needs of the child.
40%, it's the new flat tax for bad dads.
Sorry, should have said: call child protective services and start your tax-free income today! Operators are standing by!!
Post a Comment