not want to pay the psychologist either!
E. REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO REALLOCATE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONSeparately, she asks the court to order Perlmutter's recommendation for sole legal custody. She neglects to mention that she lied to him about already having sole legal custody, and that he regretted those recommendations in his deposition.
George was ordered to front the money for the comprehensive child custody evaluation with Dr. Perlmutter, while both parties are ultimately equally responsible for payment. I respectfully request, based on the history that led up to the evaluation, the outcome of the evaluation, and our differences in asset level and expenses, that George be ordered to be solely financially responsible for the cost of the comprehensive child custody evaluation.
In November 2007, Child Welfare Service (hereinafter, "CWS") investigated a substantiated emotional abuse [after a third party (other than myself) made a report CWS]. A trial held in January of 2008 found Roger to have been emotionally abusive our children. A full child custody evaluation was ordered at the conclusion of the trial. The outcome of the exhaustive full child custody evaluation further supports the contention that George is responsible for creating this reality and should be responsible for the cost of the evaluation itself.
This evaluation process, as it stands, has been a financial burden on myself (I paid close to $700 in preparing copies of Court documents to be sent to Dr. Perlmutter for his review) and has cost me many work days and much stress.
Therefore, I respectfully request the Court to order that the financial obligations for paying for evaluation fall solely on George.