“Respondent May NOT Use Internet in Any Manner to Communicate About Petitioner Ever Again”You would think that judges would have a clear understanding of free speech rights.
That’s the order that a Wisconsin court issued in telling an ex-wife that she may not speak online about her ex-husband (emphasis in original). A similar order (though only for four years, and not “ever again”) was issued barring the ex-wife from speaking online about her ex-husband’s lawyer.
The ex-wife apparently violated the order, and is now being prosecuted for violating the injunction, because she kept posting things about the ex-husband and his lawyer. ...
The injunctions strike me as patently and vastly overbroad, and therefore clearly unconstitutional.
My ex-wife complains endlessly about this blog, but I don't even use to tell bad stories about her. The purpose of this blog is to complain about the family court, not her.