The prosecution just had Michael Jackson's ex-wife testify against him. She was not a witness to any crimes, but she has a child visitation dispute with Jackson, and her testimony was just to badmouth him.
I am amazed that judges put up with prosecution witnesses like this. She adds nothing to the case against Jackson, except perhaps to suggest that Jackson is a weirdo. Everyone knows that Jackson is a weirdo. It is not a crime to be a weirdo.
I think that Jackson should be acquitted, based on what I have seen.
If I get prosecuted for some unrelated crime some day, is the DA going to chase down my ex-wife and ask her to tell the court about our marital or child-rearing disputes? It makes no sense to me. It is just not relevant evidence.