US psychologist, Mark Schwartz, has been accused of carelessly hypnotizing a patient, Lisa Nasseff, 41, in order to keep her there long-term and run up a bill that eventually reached $650,000, while she was seeking treatment for anorexia at the Castlewood Treatment Centre in St Louis, Missouri.The article calls Schwartz "careless", but that is not the right word. I am sure Schwartz knew exactly what he was doing. I could be wrong, but I think that Schwartz is a Jewish name and Nasseff is an Arab name.
Under hypnosis, Ms. Nasseff was led to believe she had multiple personality disorder (20 different personalities),she had been sexually abused and raped multiple times and had participated in various criminal and horrific acts of abuse. She was led into believing she had once eaten babies as part of a satanic cult.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Psychologist sued for implanting memories
Here is another story about a corrupt psychologist:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
A lot of the surnames that sound Jewish to Americans are simply German names such as Klein, Gross or Grossman, Weiss or Weisman, Rosen, Schwartz or Schwartzman, Segal, Siegal or Sagal, and anything that contains berg, stein, man, thal or bluth. German surnames are very common among American Jews, and many people seem to have inferred the converse: if most Jews have German surnames, then most people with German surnames must be Jews. The reasoning is appealing on a gut-level but logically flawed. Consider this absurd but logically identical argument: most Jews have ten fingers, therefore most people with ten fingers must be Jews.
There is a lot of truth about the acquisition of Jewish surnames (which in most of Europe came relatively late -1787 -1821) in what you write. I can recommend my favourite book on surnames "Dictionary of Surnames" by Hanks and Hodges (Oxford) which has a very large Jewish input. In particular look at the essay on Jewish names that it contains.
Perlmutter is in what the author describes as an 'Ornamental' name.
Edwin George "Ed" Perlmutter (born May 1, 1953) is the U.S. Representative for Colorado's 7th congressional district, serving since 2007. He is a member of the Democratic Party.
Contents [hide]
1 Early life, education and career
2 Colorado Senate
3 U.S. House of Representatives
3.1 Committee assignments
3.2 Net neutrality donations controversy
4 Political campaigns
4.1 2006
4.2 2008
4.3 2010
5 Personal life
6 References
7 External links
[edit]Early life, education and career
Perlmutter was born in Denver, Colorado. He was raised by a Jewish father and Protestant mother, and describes himself as a Christian.[1
Yes, maybe the psychologist is not Jewish, and maybe the patient is not Arab. Maybe the accusations are unfounded. Maybe the patient really has 20 different personalities. Maybe the psychology profession will adopt some new rules to prevent this sort of thing. But assuming that this story is reported accurately, I think that there are many things going wrong here.
How do you know that Morse is not a jew ? or Bret Johnson ?
A Jew Examines the Holocaust
www.jewishmag.com/32mag/morse/morse.htm - United States By Charles Morse, an American Jew,
Boris Johnson And oh, yes, of course:Has Jewish roots
Morse and Johnson are not Jewish names, as far as I know. But I have no idea about their ancestry or religion.
Look, Mitchell is a jewish name..Maybe Sally Mitchell is a Jew ?
Andrea Mitchell's Close-Up
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1617408/posts18 Apr 2006 – We gather Dan Rottenberg did not like Andrea Mitchell's new memoir ... for a young Jewish woman barely out of college
Maybe you don't know anything about
what a Jewish name might be or not be.
what are the chances you can simply let go of your "Jew psychologist" hangup until the number of "corruption" cases concerning them is greater than the number of Catholic priests accused of child molestation? or until they outnumber the children killed in Syria? get back to us when one of those things happens. in the meantime, please find something reasonable to complain about. publicly making yourself into a conspiracy theorist nut case is not going to get your children back!
I strongly agree with the comments above.
In this story, the ethnicity is interesting because it is strange that an Arab woman would put so much trust in a Jewish psychologist. Arabs and Jews are famous for not getting along. But the story does report their ethnicity, so I could be wrong.
I checked other stories, and the
$650,000 was paid by insurance, and
Nasseff had previously been forcibly committed by her mother. I do not necessarily believe Nasseff's accusations. Schwartz says that he never hypnotized Nasseff, and that they had never discussed satanic cults. But I would say that something is likely to be wrong if it is merely the case that an insurance company paid $650,000 to treat an eating disorder.
Pls. stop insulting us with your innuendo and backpeddling.
re Perlmutter
"I do not believe that a Christian heterosexual family man would write reports anything like what these jerks did. He would not charge $28000 either."In other news, a New Jersey newspaper reports:
The price was steep. As much as $160,000 to secure a donor willing to give up a human kidney for transplant.
And Levy Itzhak Rosenbaum — who told neighbors in Brooklyn he dabbled in construction and real estate — bragged on surveillance recordings that he had participated in many such black market deals.
Today, the 60-year-old Israeli pleaded guilty in federal court to helping an FBI informant procure a kidney as part of an elaborate federal sting. At the same time, he admitted arranging transplants for three other New Jersey patients with failing kidneys — all of whom underwent surgery in out-of-state hospitals after paying Rosenbaum. None of the patients or hospitals was named, nor were they charged.
It marked the first time in this country anyone has ever been convicted for brokering illegal kidney transplants for profit. ...
Separately, five Orthodox rabbis from Brooklyn and the Jersey shore were charged with laundering millions of dollars through various religious charities.
If you know such an example of a Christian heterosexual family man, then please tell me and I will post it.
Doyne is an "irish" name so it's doubtful that he is not a jew, and likely he is a catholic or christian.
SAN DIEGO -- Dr. Stephen Doyne, PhD, is widely used in the San Diego Family Court as a custody evaluator. His job is to advise the court on where children of divorce should live, which parent is more fit. The evaluations can be costly, both in emotion and dollars. Clients told the 10 News I-Team they paid Doyne between $5,000 and $30,000.
also...
How much will winning this war cost me?
E-mail: BillHoge@usa.net
Website: www.DivorceInKentucky.com
Fax: (502) 583-1223
Phone: (502) 583-2005
Custody battles are very expensive. Attorney fees of
$15,000 to $30,000 are not considered high for a true custody evaluations.
There's many other examples charging more that the $19,000 you paid. I'm guessing that they are all not Jews, and are all heterosexuals, but you have to figure most or soem are.
In Westchester County, an expert charged parents $57,000 for a report that the judge found
extremely biased toward the father.
Triple what a Jew, Perlmutter charged you.
You figure, anytime a parent pays $19,000 or more for an evaluation, a Jew is on the receiving end, and a christian, heterosexaul, family man never is ?
re Joe Kenan B.H. Cal.
This character continues to get court referrals The "consultant" presents bills for $40,000 -$50,000, court mandated.
.
I found Stephen Doyne's own web site, and his Yelp page. All four reviews give him the lowest rating. One says, "This man is a charlatan. His only concern is how much money he can extract from his unsuspecting clients (read victims)."
My complaints about Ken Perlmutter go far beyond the money he charged. For a summary, see this complaint. He is not the only crook in the system, but I want to hold him accountable for what he did.
They weren't just unhappy with what he charged either, as well. Point being, you got a much more fair price by having the Jew, than they did with the Christian, assuming he has a family, and isn't a divorced Chrstian like you. Or however you figure out that part.
and the evalutor wanted more than $30,000 for a full written report, and over $50,000 to testify. A scam if there ever was one.
George, that's $80,000, for what you had to pay Perlmutter only $28,000 for.
If Doyne did to me what Perlmutter did, then I would complain about his methodology, biases, and fees. But I don't know Doyne. Maybe Perlmutter is not the worst crook in the world. But he is the one that I know, and I do not see any reason to be restrained when I describe his biases.
Nearly everybody's account of what their evaluator did and charged is similar. "incompetent" "bias" "unfair" "too expensive" but, you're the only one I've read that attributes their complaints to the evaluator being Jewish.
They are charlatans. You are a prejudiced Christian, which means you are not a Christian. You don't subscribe to Christian Judeo values.
I do have some Christian values, and if I were imposing them on non-Christians in court, then I am sure that people would complain about that.
Yes, a lot of people complain about an evaluation being biased, and they do not know the source of the bias. I had the advantage that I was able to ask Perlmutter.
and they do not know the source of the bias. I had the advantage that I was able to ask Perlmutter.
Here is what you said about Perlmutter's and Johnson's bias, and never answered
"they were both unable to give any explanation for their opinions other than their own anti-Christian hatred."
What were the anti christian explanations that they gave for their opinions ?
What did they say that gave themselves away as christian haters ?
10:03 AM
You have posted a lot of messages here, but I am not sure what your point is. Are you arguing that Jewishness has nothing to do with what Perlmutter did in my case? If so, why would you think that?
Or are you saying that I should not post anything about Perlmutter's biases, and that I should just restrict my comments to his incompetence or his greed? If so, why shouldn't I speak about everything that I think is unjust?
Or are you saying that mentioning Jewishness is so politically incorrect that I will be punished for it? If I had a Mormon evaluator who applied Mormonism to my case, would it be wrong to complain about that?
I'm just asking you these same 2 questions again, and you're just not answering them again.
What were the anti christian explanations that they gave for their opinions ?
What did they say that gave themselves away as christian haters ?
10:03 AM
"they were both unable to give any explanation for their opinions other than their own anti-Christian hatred."
Post a Comment