Alice Miller, a psychoanalyst who repositioned the family as a locus of dysfunction with her theory that parental power and punishment lay at the root of nearly all human problems, died at her home in Provence on April 14. She was 87. ...Wow, this woman was the missing link between Freud and Oprah, and I had never heard of her!
All children, she wrote, suffer trauma and permanent psychic scarring at the hands of parents, who enforce codes of conduct through psychological pressure or corporal punishment: slaps, spankings or, in extreme cases, sustained physical abuse and even torture.
Unable to admit the rage they feel toward their tormenters, Dr. Miller contended, these damaged children limp along through life, weighed down by depression and insecurity, and pass the abuse along to the next generation, in an unending cycle. Some, in a pathetic effort to please their parents and serve their needs, distinguish themselves in the arts or professions. The Stalins and the Hitlers, Dr. Miller later wrote, inflict their childhood traumas on millions. ...
The book also stirred the general public, selling more than a million copies. Its central argument was easy to grasp and, for many readers, offered a tempting explanation for their sorrows and failures.
Dr. Miller is often credited with turning the attention of therapists to child abuse, both physical and sexual, but also with encouraging millions of adults to regard themselves as victims.
Daphne Merkin, assessing Dr. Miller’s book “The Truth Shall Set You Free” in The New York Times Book Review in 2002, wrote that Dr. Miller “could be said to be the missing link between Freud and Oprah, bringing news of the inner life, and especially the subtle hazards of emotional development, out of the cloistered offices of therapists and into a wider, user-friendly context.”
This woman seems to have been a huge source of bad ideas. Now the daytime TV talk shows are filled with quacks who are trying to turn America into a nation of victims, blaming their parents for their adult problems. I bet she never had any scientific data to support any of her claims.
5 comments:
from what I've read about her work there is no actual scientific methodology in her work. She used "psychohistory" and "psychobiography" to develop her ideas. Specifically she used experiences from her own life as an abused child as well as other historical figures like Kafka, Hitler, Picasso, Stalin, etc. Their gifts and in the cases of Stalin and Hitler psychotic behavior is laid at the feet of their abusive parents. No actual interviews were done, just reading biographies and history books. I guess if all you've got is a hammer then everything is a nail. It also goes to show you have non-rigorous the fields of psychology and sociology are compared to the sciences, engineering and such.
from what I've read about her work there is no actual scientific methodology in her work. She used "psychohistory" and "psychobiography" to develop her ideas. Specifically she used experiences from her own life as an abused child as well as other historical figures like Kafka, Hitler, Picasso, Stalin, etc. Their gifts and in the cases of Stalin and Hitler psychotic behavior is laid at the feet of their abusive parents. No actual interviews were done, just reading biographies and history books. I guess if all you've got is a hammer then everything is a nail. It also goes to show you have non-rigorous the fields of psychology and sociology are compared to the sciences, engineering and such.
how much you want to bet you can find about as many examples of both genius and psychopaths with normal parents? So much for statistical sampling.
You are confirming my suspicions. A scientific analysis would be based on subjects in a study, not speculations about public figures.
I think a lot of what drives her "studies" and those who go along with them is the fact they're looking to blame others as opposed to taking responsibility for their own actions. Sure, you can blame the government, Goldman Sachs, your parents, whoever you want for problems, but at the end of the day you're responsible for taking action to deal with it. And on your own terms, these so-called experts go into sociology and psychology because they're trying to address their own issues, and then "get religion" and decide to solve everyone else's problems. But since they are sanctified with the appropriate degrees they're considered experts and none shall cross them and their superior knowledge as they know best. Again, the hammer and nail analogy.
Post a Comment