Father cannot discuss religion

Law prof Volokh writes:

In December, a New York appellate court held that Daniel should be allowed supervised visitation after his parole expires this summer. But the court also upheld, in the name of "the best interest of the children," the trial court's order that Daniel not discuss with the children "any issues pertaining to his religion." ...

The father may be a Mohammedan kook, but the judge is still overextending his authority when he prohibits a man from discussing his religion.