tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post5945969138511377091..comments2024-02-19T09:57:54.701-08:00Comments on The Angry Dad: Money trial todayGeorgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16032672334544228703noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-50080676520155824402009-01-26T14:53:00.000-08:002009-01-26T14:53:00.000-08:00I have to respectfully disagree novemburd. This i...I have to respectfully disagree novemburd. This isn't a system where the Judge gets a feeling or a thought in his head and seeks out to destroy one of the two adverserial parties. Their is more than enough evidence to show that powerful feminist organizations have been able to dictate policy within Family Courts, CPS, many others. I would suggest you do some research into the matter. Judges who don't get on board are attacked vicously by said groups. Many are sent to what is essentially a re-education camp to learn the ways of the NOW. Others who have "poor performance" (dont judge for the Women) are ousted. Again, do your own homework.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-47036016760745554762009-01-25T17:56:00.000-08:002009-01-25T17:56:00.000-08:00Look. The problem is two fold: 1. The court system...Look. The problem is two fold: 1. The court system is really screwed up. 2. There are both men and women who play the system to get revenge on an ex. <BR/><BR/>So just blaming women is not resolving the problem of Revenge By Court. Nor is just blaming men. It's the adversarial court system plus the revenge oriented person with money(sometimes the court is convinced to have the victim pay the Revenger's court expenses, too). I have seen both men and women get screwed over by a revengeful ex who snows the court. The judges are human and in the Santa Cruz Family Court I have seen the Commissioner in action. Commissioner Joseph gets a bug up his brain and decides no matter what the evidence, one party is always wrong and needs his personal Hammer of Justice.<BR/><BR/>The accountability issue is not really gender based (even if frothing in hatred of women is soothing to your ego) but the system needs to be reformed so that *revengeful ex's* are held accountable AND the IDIOT judge!!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864887386631942936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-68379400518347244932009-01-24T16:49:00.000-08:002009-01-24T16:49:00.000-08:00Obviously that poster is not actually asking a que...Obviously that poster is not actually asking a question. It's clearly someone from julies side. Notice the "found true love" vomit they love to throw out there. Great, I'm sure George is so happy he had two children with that monster while she used him as a starter Husband to find the "true love". You people are disgusting and make the World miserable. Why in God's name did we allow our women to have zero accountability and ethics? OK, she found another sucker willing to put up with her insanity..woo hoo. Good for the poor slob. Now, why doesn't he flip the bills for her and why doesn't George get to see his kids? Guess he's not up for the job eh? These people don't actually make people see things their way. They actually create MRA's everyday. Ladies aren't gonna like the backlash.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-38849654468183782032009-01-22T19:27:00.000-08:002009-01-22T19:27:00.000-08:00I would support my kids by helping to take care of...I would support my kids by helping to take care of them if I could. But my ex-wife just wants the cash instead.Georgehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16156601701199073003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-57234032926508773252009-01-21T12:12:00.000-08:002009-01-21T12:12:00.000-08:00Angry dad is paying support. In fact he's paying s...Angry dad is paying support. In fact he's paying support based on phantom income that Commissioner Joseph made up. Ex- wife is an attorney and has a high earning capability. Ex-wife is entitled to 1/2 *community property*, not all assets. Some assets might be sole property. And that was all settled. Why does ex-wife want to revisit money matters that were settled years ago? Yeah, it's all about the money.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864887386631942936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-80143834655802765772009-01-21T06:36:00.000-08:002009-01-21T06:36:00.000-08:00Sigh......Perhaps if you would just man up and ful...Sigh......<BR/><BR/>Perhaps if you would just man up and fulfill your responsibilities to your child and ex wife you could finally put this case behind you and move on.<BR/><BR/>Why do you refuse to support your children?<BR/><BR/>Furthermore,<BR/><BR/>Just because your wife was able to find true love elsewhere doesn;t mean she isn't still entitled to her half of all marital assets. You get half and she gets half. Why is tha so hard to accept?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-59590771309954125102009-01-17T09:31:00.000-08:002009-01-17T09:31:00.000-08:00Yes, I think CJ wants to hold the contempt sentenc...Yes, I think CJ wants to hold the contempt sentencing over your head as a way to get you to comply with his unlawful orders. Also there may be hesitation on his part to sentence you - if you publicize the whole story of how he has been running his own investigation by having one of his staff read your blog, and interfering in your case by writing to your ex-wife to encourage her to file the motion for contempt, he might be in big trouble for ethics violations. I checked with the just received Handbook of Judicial Ethics and judges are NOT allowed to investigate cases on their own.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864887386631942936noreply@blogger.com