tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post3653836430412923506..comments2024-02-19T09:57:54.701-08:00Comments on The Angry Dad: Supreme court hears Indian dadGeorgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16032672334544228703noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-7954474502767871802013-06-14T08:23:57.083-07:002013-06-14T08:23:57.083-07:00"This sort of argument is made all the time i..."This sort of argument is made all the time in family court. A mom will make a phony domestic violence charge, get temporary custody pending an investigation, and when the investigation fails to back her up, she argues that preserving her sole custody would be in the BIOTCh because the kid is accustomed to that."<br /><br />Yup, in my case, there wasn't even a charge, just the threat (between attorneys) of a charge, so on the advice of my attorney, I vacated. He said my ex-wife-elect could get a TRO in 24 hours just on her representation that she was afraid I might commit domestic violence. By vacating, there never was a TRO in the case file. I was happy to leave the house, but it was never my intention to leave the kids or neglect to visit them.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com