tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post2930144078403967083..comments2024-02-19T09:57:54.701-08:00Comments on The Angry Dad: Law to let sperm donors sueGeorgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16032672334544228703noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-29146488793576946202013-08-23T11:56:37.640-07:002013-08-23T11:56:37.640-07:00Thanks for the explanation. The trend is to replac...Thanks for the explanation. The trend is to replace bright-line rules with the whims of a judge. I prefer the rules. Even if the rules are not the best, there is often a work-around with predictable results. The judge is not predictable.Georgehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16032672334544228703noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8081447.post-13868806828684470232013-08-23T08:44:27.315-07:002013-08-23T08:44:27.315-07:00Absolutely agree with you, George. That sentence ...Absolutely agree with you, George. That sentence claiming courts are finding it difficult to harmonize 7611(d) with 7613(b) is a complete misrepresentation. The court had no difficulty. When 7613(b) applies, 7611(d) does not.<br /><br />7611(d) is more pertinent in an inheritance case where children of a marriage are trying to eliminate a child not of the marriage. During the lifetime of the father, he could simply assert paternity and sue for custody or visitation. Then the court would determine paternity either by voluntary admission of the parties or by force if necessary.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com